Is the YCJA effective?

September 20, 2020 Off By idswater

Is the YCJA effective?

There has also been a significant reduction in the use of the court under the YCJA . Youth court cases declined by 26 percent between 2002-03 and 2009-10 (see Figure 2). After a large initial drop, the number of youth court cases has remained relatively stable.

Is the YCJA too lenient?

The aim was to understand what provokes a delinquent’s actions. However, ultimately, the Youth Criminal Justice Act is too lenient in regards to serious youth crime. With incentives such as peer pressure or a continual lack of strict authority, many young offenders fall into the trap of first committing lighter crimes.

Is the YCJA helping to reduce youth crime?

YCJA Principles The YCJA states that the youth criminal justice system is intended to protect the public by holding youth accountable, promoting the rehabilitation and reintegration of youth back into society, and preventing crime.

What does the YCJA prohibit?

The privacy protections in the YCJA also ban the identification of young victims or witnesses of crimes alleged to have been committed by youth. Publication of the identity of a young person, a victim or a witness in contravention of the YCJA provisions is a criminal offence which can carry up to two years in custody.

Why the YCJA is bad?

The YCJA is ineffective because of the following three components:It put public safety at risk,it is too lienent and it provides a high chance for youth to reoffend. Although YCJA is an ineffective law ,some people insist that YCJA is effective.

How has the YCJA been successful?

The YCJA has succeeded in significantly reducing the rates of use of court and custody, without increasing recorded youth crime. There continue to be significant regional variations in rates of use of youth courts and custody. Youth crime remains a contentious political concern in Canada.

Is the YCJA fair?

The Youth Justice system is fair and equitable; it uses a rehabilitative method that helps reintegrate youth back into society as normal functioning citizens.

Is the law too soft on youth crime?

No, the law is not too soft on youth crime. The law has made it a goal to not only punish youths for their actions but to also rehabillitate them so they can become responsible citizens.

Why is the YCJA bad?

Why are publications banned?

A publication ban may be appropriate, for example, to: encourage witnesses who are afraid to testify; protect vulnerable witnesses, including children and victims of crime; encourage victims and others to report offences that are usually under-reported, such as sexual offences; and.

Why does the YCJA treat youth differently than adults?

YCJA principles Young people are more vulnerable than adults, so they need more protection. Young people are not fully mature yet, so they must be held responsible in different ways than adults. Young people’s privacy deserves more protection than adults’ privacy.

Who does a publication ban apply to?

The prosecutor, victim, witness, or justice system participant must ask for a publication ban in writing. The person asking for the order must explain why he or she needs this type of protection. The request is made to the judge who will be hearing the case.

What are the pros and cons of the YCJA?

4. Provide rehabilitation:The YCJA aims at providing rehabilitation and reintegration of the offenders to programs in the community that addresses their offending behavior. 5. Lenient punishment:The youths receive less punishment compared to adults who are given harsh punishments.

What are the pros and cons of Youth Court?

The justice system correct and rehabilitates those above 12 years and below 18 years of age. In youth/juvenile courts, there are no trials and the youths are given less punishment with a chance of getting counseling after getting out. In extreme cases, youth offenders are given adult punishment.

What are the benefits of the Youth Criminal Justice Act?

The Youth Criminal Justice Act has decreased the level of youth incarceration because it is no longer a required consequence for many cases in which incarceration was previously imposed. There is a very clear change in direction as well with respect to criminal justice and social values.

What are the alternatives to jail for YCJA?

Alternative sentencing methods: The youths have reduced jail time and are given an alternative option to complete their sentences like imposing curfews and house arrest. If sentenced for 5 years; they can spend 2 years in jail and 3 years in a rehabilitation program. 7.

4. Provide rehabilitation:The YCJA aims at providing rehabilitation and reintegration of the offenders to programs in the community that addresses their offending behavior. 5. Lenient punishment:The youths receive less punishment compared to adults who are given harsh punishments.

The justice system correct and rehabilitates those above 12 years and below 18 years of age. In youth/juvenile courts, there are no trials and the youths are given less punishment with a chance of getting counseling after getting out. In extreme cases, youth offenders are given adult punishment.

Alternative sentencing methods: The youths have reduced jail time and are given an alternative option to complete their sentences like imposing curfews and house arrest. If sentenced for 5 years; they can spend 2 years in jail and 3 years in a rehabilitation program. 7.

When to use an extrajudicial sanction under the YCJA?

If the young person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the sanction, the case may proceed through the court process. An extrajudicial sanction can be used only if the young person cannot be adequately dealt with by a warning, caution or referral. Experience under the YCJA