What is stacking the deck in literature?

December 22, 2019 Off By idswater

What is stacking the deck in literature?

The term stacking the deck is a fallacy in which any evidence that supports an opposing argument is simply rejected, omitted, or ignored. Stacking the deck is a technique that’s commonly used in propaganda. It is also known as special pleading, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, or one-sided assessment.

What is card stacking logical fallacy?

A one-sided argument (also known as card stacking, stacking the deck, ignoring the counterevidence, slanting, and suppressed evidence) is an informal fallacy that occurs when only the reasons supporting a proposition are supplied, while all reasons opposing it are omitted.

What is an example of card stacking?

Basically, Card-Stacking means stacking the cards in favor of the product; advertisers stress is positive qualities and ignore negative. For example, if a brand of snack food is loaded with sugar (and calories), the commercial may boast that the product is low in fat, which implies that it is also low in calories.

How is stacking the deck a logical fallacy?

“Propagandists selectively choose their information or ‘stack the deck’ by ignoring certain facts to present a one-sided view” (Adam Murrell, Reclaiming Reason, 2002). Comstock Images/Getty Images

Where does the phrase’stack the deck’come from?

She had stacked the deck in order to gain an advantage in the party elections. If you have so many people from his community in the jury, it stacks the deck. The phrase originates from card games and the fact that stacking the deck in an unfair manner gave an advantage to a player in order to win.

Who is the author of stacking the deck?

Dr. Richard Nordquist is professor emeritus of rhetoric and English at Georgia Southern University and the author of several university-level grammar and composition textbooks. The term stacking the deck is a fallacy in which any evidence that supports an opposing argument is simply rejected, omitted, or ignored.

Which is a fallacy based on appeal to ridicule?

Fallacy Based on Appeal to Ridicule. Sarcasm is always hostile. Ridicule, sarcasm, and the “horse laugh” are the persuasion techniques of bullies. Appeal to ridicule tries to convince you to accept an argument in order to avoid becoming the butt of the joke.